Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology
The Korean Society of Wood Science & Technology
Original Article

Ensuring Consumer Safety: Molecular Authentication of Eurycoma longifolia Derivative Products in the Wood Science and Technology Industry

Arida SUSILOWATI1,https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9608-4787, Henti Hendalastuti RACHMAT2, Kusumadewi Sri YULITA2, Asep HIDAYAT2, Susila SUSILA3, Nawwall ARROFAHA4, Irsyad KAMAL5, Fifi Gus DWIYANTI6
1Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20353, Indonesia
2Research Centre for Ecology and Ethnobiology, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor 16911, Indonesia
3Research Centre for Biosystematics and Evolution, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor 16911, Indonesia
4Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Banten 15412, Indonesia
5Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Walisongo, Semarang 50185, Indonesia
6Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
Corresponding author: Arida SUSILOWATI (e-mail: arida.susilowati@usu.ac.id)

Copyright 2024 The Korean Society of Wood Science & Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Feb 13, 2024; Revised: Apr 03, 2024; Accepted: Apr 24, 2024

Published Online: Jul 25, 2024

ABSTRACT

Eurycoma longifolia (pasak bumi) is a popular medicinal plant in Indonesia and is widely used in various products. Its high economic value has caused illegal harvesting and product falsification. Using molecular techniques, the authentication and traceability of E. longifolia derivatives can be controlled to ensure consumer safety. Therefore, this study aimed to authenticate the products and derivatives of E. longifolia (pasak bumi) produced, marketed, and consumed in Indonesia using molecular identification techniques. Genomic DNA from 37 leaf samples collected from the Sumatran mainland and the Riau Islands and six E. longifolia products were amplified and sequenced using trnL-trnF and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. The results revealed that all leaf samples were indeed E. longifolia based on the markers used, with the six products, only the herbal tea product (sample code TCPB) was most likely derived from E. longifolia based on the two regions, suggesting that not all products labelled as E. longifolia in the market are authentic. The results also indicated that several other plants species are used as substitutes or adulterants, including Simaba spp., Simarouba spp., Homalolepis spp., Vernonia gigantea, Elephantopus scaber, Gymnanthemum amygdalinum, Cyanthillium spp., Potentilla lineata, Ailanthus altissima, Geijera paniculata, Hannoa chlorantha, and Dalbergia spp. Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria were also identified in this study on the outer wooden cup of E. longifolia products. Therefore, this molecular approach is effective in identifying the authenticity of E. longifolia products, with trnL-trnF and ITS as the recommended DNA markers.

Keywords: authentication; DNA barcoding; Eurycoma longifolia; medicinal plant

1. INTRODUCTION

The current lifestyle trend leans towards natural-based practices, including healthcare and medicine (Coutinho Moraes et al., 2015; Elkordy et al., 2021; Insuasti-Cruz et al., 2022). This shift is driven by a desire for holistic well-being and a growing recognition of the benefits of plant-derived substances. Plant-derived medicines offer sustainable alternatives to synthetic drugs (Elkordy et al., 2021), align with environmental concerns (Theodoridis et al., 2023), and reduce reliance on non-renewable resources (Verpoorte et al., 2008). Advances in scientific research further support the importance of plant-based medicines as they uncover bioactive compounds with potential therapeutic applications (Gautam et al., 2023; Nyakudya et al., 2020). Eurycoma longifolia commonly referred to as pasak bumi or tongkat ali in the Indonesian and Malay languages is renowned for its medicinal properties in Southeast Asian countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, and Vietnam (Bhat and Karim, 2010; Chua et al., 2005; Evans Schultes, 1980; Kassim et al., 2002). E. longifolia possesses a diverse array of bioactive compounds. These include quassinoids, β-carboline alkaloids, canthin-6-one alkaloids, triterpene-type tirucallane, derivatives of squalene, eurycolactone, eurycomalactone, laurycolactone, biphenyl neolignan, and bioactive steroids (Ang et al., 2000; Kuo et al., 2004; Mahfudh and Pihie, 2008; Miyake et al., 2009; Tran et al., 2014). The presence of these compounds contributes to the diverse pharmacological activities of E. longifolia, making it a subject of great interest for research and development of herbal products. This plant species grows naturally in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Thailand. In addition to its antimalarial, antipyretic, antiulcer, cytotoxic, and aphrodisiac properties (Bhat and Karim, 2010; Chua et al., 2005; Evans Schultes, 1980; Kassim et al., 2002) the root extracts have been traditionally used to enhance testosterone levels in men.

The significant value and affordability of this species has led to an increased market demand and intensive trade, both domestically and internationally (Sihotang and Rahmawati, 2019). Unfortunately, this high demand has led to illegal export practices and the potential overexploitation of E. longifolia in Indonesia (Susilowati et al., 2021). The sustainable utilisation of this species is compromised by the persistence of current practices. Consequently, it is imperative to establish systems capable of monitoring and delineating the origins of plants and their derived products, as demonstrated by DNA barcoding (Abubakar et al., 2018).

Molecular identification techniques, particularly DNA-based methods, play a pivotal role in the authentication and traceability of herbal products derived from E. longifolia. DNA markers have proven to be powerful tools for validating the authenticity and traceability of herbal and food products (Ganie et al., 2015) as in the case of Korean ginseng (Jung et al., 2014), manuka honey (McDonald et al., 2018), Orthosiphon stamineus herbal medicine (Liow et al., 2021), and processed hairtail fish products (Abdullah et al., 2019). These methods provide a reliable means of verifying the presence and authenticity of plant materials in various commercial products, including dietary supplements, traditional medicine, and herbal preparations (Fadzil et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2010; Han et al., 2016; Howard et al., 2019; Noh et al., 2018). By analysing specific genetic markers such as DNA barcodes, it is possible to differentiate E. longifolia from other related species and detect any adulteration or substitution that may occur in the market (Gao et al., 2010; Han et al., 2016).

Molecular identification methods have been widely used to confirm the presence of E. longifolia in commercial products. Studies have successfully employed techniques such as DNA sequencing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and DNA barcoding to assess the quality and authenticity of E. longifolia-based products (Abubakar et al., 2018; Vejayan et al., 2018). These molecular techniques provide accurate and reliable results, allowing for better regulation and control of the trade of E. longifolia products and ensuring consumer safety.

Although previous studies have authenticated E. longifolia products, the derivative products of this species have become increasingly diverse (Abubakar et al., 2018). In Indonesia, raw materials are extracted from the wild because of the species’ lack of cultivation or domestication (Pasaribu et al., 2021; Suwardi et al., 2022). This has led to a decrease in authentic raw materials, prompting the use of species falsely branded as E. longifolia (Li et al., 2013; Mohammed Abubakar et al., 2017). Consequently, the need for broader authentication efforts has been emphasised. Moreover, the diversity of adulterated materials varies between localities, regions, and countries based on the occurrence of complementary species (Soares et al., 2017), necessitating specific authentication methods tailored to each geographical context. This study aimed to authenticate the products or derivatives of E. longifolia (pasak bumi) produced, marketed, and consumed in Indonesia using molecular identification techniques.

2. MATERIALS and METHODS

2.1. Plant material

A total of 37 leaf samples of E. longifolia were collected from the Sumatran mainland and Riau Islands, Indonesia (Table 1). Leaf samples were labelled, wrapped in sample envelopes, and dried with silica gel. In addition, six herbal products from the roots of E. longifolia (HPs) in various forms were also used (Table 2). In the present study, leaf samples of E. longifolia were used as the primary reference for authentication. These leaf samples served as crucial benchmarks for comparison with claimed derivative products of E. longifolia, including wood and roots. This approach allowed us to comprehensively evaluate and verify the authenticity of a wide range of E. longifolia products and provided valuable insights into the product origins and potential falsifications. The molecular analyses were performed at the Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.

Table 1. List of sample collections of Eurycoma longifolia leaves from Sumatra mainland and Riau Islands
No Sample code Population Location
1 02EL Nagari Forest/Paru Village Sijunjung District, Sijunjung Regency, West Sumatra Province
2 03EL Nagari Forest/Paru Village Sijunjung District, Sijunjung Regency, West Sumatra Province
3 04EL Nagari Forest/Paru Village Sijunjung District, Sijunjung Regency, West Sumatra Province
4 06EL Nagari Forest/Timbulun Village Sijunjung District, Sijunjung Regency, West Sumatra Province
5 07EL Nagari Forest/Timbulun Village Sijunjung District, Sijunjung Regency, West Sumatra Province
6 08EL Nagari Forest/Timbulun Village Sijunjung District, Sijunjung Regency, West Sumatra Province
7 09EL Nagari Forest/Timbulun Village Sijunjung District, Sijunjung Regency, West Sumatra Province
8 10EL Nagari Forest/Timbulun Village Sijunjung District, Sijunjung Regency, West Sumatra Province
9 A8-3 Riau A8-3 Ampang Delapan – Riau Province
10 R1EL Rumbio Kampar – Riau Province
11 R2EL Rumbio Kampar – Riau Province
12 1PEL Papaso Village Batang Lubu Sutan, Padang Lawas-North Sumatra Province
13 4PEL Papaso Village Batang Lubu Sutan, Padang Lawas-North Sumatra Province
14 5PEL Papaso Village Batang Lubu Sutan, Padang Lawas-North Sumatra Province
15 6PEL Papaso Village Batang Lubu Sutan, Padang Lawas-North Sumatra Province
16 7PEL Papaso Village Batang Lubu Sutan, Padang Lawas-North Sumatra Province
17 8PEL Papaso Village Batang Lubu Sutan, Padang Lawas-North Sumatra Province
18 9PEL Papaso Village Batang Lubu Sutan, Padang Lawas-North Sumatra Province
19 10PEL Papaso Village Batang Lubu Sutan, Padang Lawas-North Sumatra Province
20 PU1T Tembesi Protected Forest Tembesi, Sagulung District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
21 PU3T Tembesi Protected Forest Tembesi, Sagulung District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
22 PU4T Tembesi Protected Forest Tembesi, Sagulung District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
23 PU2D Duriangkang Protected Forest Kabil, Nongsa District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
24 PU4D Duriangkang Protected Forest Kabil, Nongsa District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
25 PU7D Duriangkang Protected Forest Kabil, Nongsa District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
26 PU8TN Tiban Protected Forest Tiban Lama, Sekupang District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
27 PU10TN Tiban Protected Forest Tiban Lama, Sekupang District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
28 PU12TN Tiban Protected Forest Tiban Lama, Sekupang District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
29 PU7SH Sei Harapan Protected Forest Tanjung Riau, Sekupang District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
30 PU14SH Sei Harapan Protected Forest Tanjung Riau, Sekupang District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
31 PU21SH Sei Harapan Protected Forest Tanjung Riau, Sekupang District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
32 PU8N Nongsa Batam Protected Forest Sambau, Nongsa District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
33 PU11N Nongsa Batam Protected Forest Sambau, Nongsa District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
34 PU13N Nongsa Batam Protected Forest Sambau, Nongsa District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
35 PU2DG Dangas Protected Forest Tanjung Pinggir, Sekupang District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
36 PU6DG Dangas Protected Forest Tanjung Pinggir, Sekupang District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
37 PU9DG Dangas Protected Forest Tanjung Pinggir, Sekupang District, Batam City, Riau Islands Province
Download Excel Table
Table 2. List of sample collections of Eurycoma longifolia herbal products
No Sample code Product Serving form Source Photo
1 TCPB Herbal tea Root chips Shopee*: Herbal healing official wood-52-4-343-i1
2 GDPB Inner wooden cup Solid root Shopee: Fatya_chan wood-52-4-343-i2
3 GLPB Outer wooden cup Solid root Shopee: Fatya_chan
4 APBC Tea from root Root powder Shopee: Fatya_chan wood-52-4-343-i3
5 KPB Herbal capsules Root powder Shopee: Syahira Bodher wood-52-4-343-i4
6 SAPB Dry root chips Root chips Shopee: Fatya_chan wood-52-4-343-i5

Shopee is the largest e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia.

TCPB: herbal tea product, GDPB: wooden cup, GLPB: wooden cup, APBC: herbal tea product, KPB: herbal capsules, SAPB: dry root chips.

Download Excel Table
2.2. DNA isolation, amplification, and sequencing

Leaf samples of E. longifolia were isolated using a Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Plant) from GeneAid, and products from E. longifolia were isolated using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA; HB-0542-003+1101205_PCard_DNY_Plant_Spi) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Two molecular markers, namely trnL-trnF and the whole internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions, were selected for PCR amplification and DNA sequencing. The PCR amplification of the trnL-trnF region in E. longifolia leaf samples employed a set of universal primers, with the forward primer ‘c’ (5’-CGAAATCGGTAGACGCTACG-3’) and reverse primer ‘f’ (5’-ATTTGAACTGGTGACACGAG-3’; Taberlet et al., 1991). For the E. longifolia product sample, universal forward primer pair ‘c’ (5’-CGAAATCGGTAGACGCTACG-3’) and reverse primer ‘d’ (5’-GGG GATAGA GGGACTTGAAC-3’), forward primer ‘e’ (5’-GGTTCA AGTCCCTCTATCCC-3’), and reverse primer ‘f’ (5’-AT TTGAACTGGTGACACGAG-3’; Taberlet et al., 1991) were used. The PCR amplification of genomic DNA from E. longifolia leaf samples and its products from the ITS region was performed using universal primers. The forward primer pair ‘ITS 5P’ (5’-GGAAGGAGAAGTC GTAACAAGG-3’) and reverse primer ‘ITS 8P’ (5’-CACGCTTCTCCAGACTACA -3’) were utilised in this procedure (Möller and Cronk, 1997).

The preparation of the PCR mixture for genomic DNA from leaf samples involved a total volume of 12.5 μL. This comprised 6.25 μL of 2x My Taq HS Red Mix PCR buffer (Bioline, Meridian Bioscience, Newtown, OH, USA), 0.25 μL each of the forward and reverse primers, 4.75 μL of nuclease-free water (QIAGEN), and 1 μL of the DNA template. The PCR mixture for genomic DNA derived from E. longifolia products had a total volume of 13.5 μL. This included 0.375 μL of both the forward and reverse primers (5 pmol each), 0.25 μL of Taq DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan), 2.5 μL of dNTP (Toyobo), 6.25 μL of PCR buffer KOD FX Neo (Toyobo), 2.75 μL of nuclease-free water (QIAGEN), and 1 μL of the DNA template (10 ng/μL). The amplification reactions were conducted using the Sedi G Thermo Cycler (Wealtec Bioscience, New Taipei City, Taiwan) under optimal conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, denaturation at 94°C for 30 secs, annealing at 55°C for 30 secs, extension at 72°C for 1 min and 30 secs, and a final extension at 72°C for 4 min. The PCR amplification process was done over 35 cycles.

PCR products were visualised on a 1% agarose gel (Agarose Vivantis, Shah Alam, Malaysia) and stained with GelRed (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) using an electrophoretic process that lasted 30 min at 100 volts. After the electrophoresis process was completed, the target bands were photographed using a gel documentation system (Bioinstrument, ATTO Biosystems, Amherst, NY, USA). The amplified PCR products were sent to a 1st Base company for Sanger sequencing.

2.3. Data analysis

The compiled sequences from the forward and reverse sequences were integrated using ATGC version 4.3.5. The nucleotide composition of the trnL-trnF and ITS 5P-8P genes was assessed using MEGA X software (Kumar et al., 2016). To ascertain homology and identity, samples were aligned with the GenBank DNA database using BLASTn (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ Blast.cgi). The BLASTn analysis identified the sequence with the highest percentage of similarity as the one most closely related to the query sequence. To reconstruct the phylogenetic tree, samples from this study were juxtaposed with reference sequences obtained from NCBI GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Bayesian inference was conducted using MrBayes 3.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001) integrated as plugins in Geneious Prime version 2021.0, with the HKY85 substitution model and a distributed gamma rate variation. The analysis involved two independent Markov chain (MCMC) runs of four chains for 1,100,000 generations, with tree topologies sampled every 200 generations. Burn-in periods, determined by the SD of split frequency values, were set to 100,000 generations, considering values < 0.95 as strongly and weakly supported (Devecchi et al., 2018).

3. RESULTS and DISCUSSION

3.1. Sequence homology and identity of Eurycoma longifolia HPs

The amplicon sizes of the trnL-trnF chloroplast and ITS genes from the 37 leaf samples were 957 and 845 bp, respectively. The results of the BLASTn analysis of the trnL-trnF and ITS regions showed that the E. longifolia leaf samples in the study had 99%–100% similarity with the Eurycoma sample in GenBank (Table 3). Thus, the BLASTn analysis results confirmed the identity of E. longifolia samples collected from the Sumatra mainland and Riau Islands used in this study.

Table 3. Reference sequences with the closest similarity to Eurycoma longifolia leaf samples in the study based on BLASTn analysis for trnL-trnF and ITS regions
No Region Similarity Accession % Similarity % Query cover Reference
1 trnL-trnF Eurycoma apiculata GU593014 100.00 100 Muellner-Riehl et al., 2016
E. longifolia MH751519 99.79 100 Ng et al., 2019
Simarouba versicolor MG599400 99.16 99 Devecchi et al., 2018
Perriera madagascariensis GU593020 98.96 100 Muellner-Riehl et al., 2016
Homalolepis morettii MG599405 98.96 100 Devecchi et al., 2018
2 ITS E. longifolia MN715379 98.16 83 Unpublished
E. longifolia MG643109 98.98 81 Devecchi et al., 2018
Ailanthus altissima OX327691 88.62 100 Unpublished
Simaba guianensis MG643102 93.19 81 Devecchi et al., 2018
Homalolepis cuneata MG643083 93.18 81 Devecchi et al., 2018

ITS: Internal transcribed spacer.

Download Excel Table

Sequencing attempts for some root or root chip products (GLPB and SAPB; Table 2) using the trnL-trnF region were unsuccessful despite three repetitions of the DNA extraction procedure with several modifications. The sequence readings generated for both products were highly unreadable, resulting in only four products being displayed in the amplification results using the trnL-trnF region (Table 4). These unreadable products were excluded from further analysis. GLPB and SAPB are products that physically consist of solid woody root or root chips and are sold as E. longifolia woody root. DNA extraction from wood is more challenging than that from fresh leaves (Liepelt et al., 2006; Swetha et al., 2014), thus potentially complex modifications in the DNA extraction process may be required to yield more pure genomic DNA, leading to higher success rates during sequencing. This is especially important if the wood material used in product manufacturing is not authentic E. longifolia but rather substitute species that are more abundant and easily accessible. To mask the characteristics of the substitute species, manufacturers often employ additional processes involving various chemicals that can affect the appearance of the substitute material (Psifidi et al., 2015). With such processes, DNA extraction becomes more difficult because of the need to eliminate numerous chemical compounds to obtain pure DNA for amplification in the subsequent stages. Modifications to the DNA extraction process are crucial for enhancing the purity and quality of genomic DNA extracted from wood products (Fatima et al., 2018; Finkeldey et al., 2010). These modifications include optimising the extraction protocol for wood samples, pre-treating samples to remove contaminants, employing physical disruption methods, and using specialised DNA purification kits (Dilley and Chapman, 2019; Rachmat et al., 2024; Rachmayanti et al., 2006; Verbylaitė et al., 2010).

Table 4. Reference sequences with the closest similarity to Eurycoma longifolia products in the study based on BLASTn analysis GenBank for both the trnL-trnF and ITS regions
Region No. Sample code No. Accession % Similarity % Query cover Species References
trnL-trnF 1 APBC NC_063303.1 98.89 99 Dalbergia obtusifolia Unpublished
MH547571.1 100.00 95 Dalbergia latifolia Lee et al., 2019
MN251247.1 98.70 99 Dalbergia cochinchinensis Song et al., 2019
MN251245.1 98.70 99 Dalbergia hupeana Song et al., 2019
MN251242.1 98.70 99 Dalbergia sissoo Song et al., 2019
2 GDPB MG599402.1 92.65 99 Simaba monophylla Devecchi et al., 2018
MG599406.1 92.48 99 Simarouba glauca Devecchi et al., 2018
MG599436.1 92.46 99 Homalolepis subcymosa Devecchi et al., 2018
MG599404.1 92.46 99 Homalolepis glabra Devecchi et al., 2018
MG599403.1 92.46 99 Homalolepis pumila Devecchi et al., 2018
3 KPB GU818102.1 98.83 100 Vernonia gigantea Pelser et al., 2010
NC_061907.1 98.83 99 Elephantopus scaber Unpublished
NC_053851.1 98.44 99 Gymnanthemum amygdalinum Zhou et al., 2021
MZ958830.1 98.05 99 Cyanthillium cinereum Unpublished
OK040129.1 98.05 99 C. cinereum Unpublished
4 TCPB MH751519.1 99.67 100 E. longifolia Ng et al., 2019
MG599405.1 99.49 97 Homalolepis morettii Devecchi et al., 2018
MG599406.1 98.81 97 S. glauca Devecchi et al., 2018
MG599407.1 98.48 97 Homalolepis suffruticosa Devecchi et al., 2018
MG599416.1 98.80 97 Simaba pubicarpa Devecchi et al., 2018
ITS 5P-8P 1 KPB JX564720.1 98.82 89 E. scaber Devecchi et al., 2018
MT914283.1 97.70 92 Potentilla lineata Liang, 2020
DQ813304.1 97.18 94 E. scaber Unpublished
KP052671.1 97.28 92 E. scaber Unpublished
JN407429.1 97.52 90 E. scaber Unpublished
2 SAPB OX327710.1 85.89 100 Ailanthus altissima -
OX327691.1 85.89 100 A. altissima -
DQ787413.1 86.38 93 Simarouba amara Unpublished
MN082855.1 83.69 99 Geijera paniculata Duretto et al., 2020
MN715379.1 85.73 87 E. longifolia Unpublished
3 TCPB MG643109.1 98.06 88 E. longifolia Devecchi et al., 2018
MN715379.1 96.98 87 E. longifolia Unpublished
MG643102.1 92.39 88 Simaba guianensis Devecchi et al., 2018
MG643083.1 92.24 88 Homalolepis cuneata Devecchi et al., 2018
MG643108.1 92.09 88 Hannoa chlorantha Devecchi et al., 2018
4 GLPB UPPER CP115837.1 100.00 99 Klebsiella pneumoniae Unpublished
CP115930.1 100.00 99 K. pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae Unpublished
CP095426.1 100.00 99 K. pneumoniae Tang et al., 2023
CP095428.1 100.00 99 K. pneumoniae Tang et al., 2023
CP115714.1 100.00 99 K. pneumoniae Unpublished

ITS: internal transcribed spacer, APBC: herbal tea product, GDPB: wooden cup, KPB: herbal capsules, TCPB: herbal tea product, GLPB: wooden cup, SAPB: dry root chips.

Download Excel Table

The trnL-trnF BLASTn sequence of E. longifolia products showed that only the TCPB (root chips) product was similar to E. longifolia MH751519.1 (99.67%). However, the GDPB product was similar to Simaba monophylla MG599402.1 (92.65%), Simarouba glauca MG599406.1 (92.48%), and Homalolepis species such as Homalolepis subcymosa MG599436.1 (92.46%), Homalolepis glabra MG599404.1 (92.46%), Homalolepis pumila MG599403.1 (92.46%), which belongs to the same family as E. longifolia, namely Simaroubaceae (Table 4). The two products, TCPB and GDPB, were similar to E. longifolia and the Simaroubaceae family sequences from GenBank in the trnL-trnF sequence, indicating that these products were most likely derived from E. longifolia. Meanwhile, the other root powder products (APBC and KPB) had dissimilarities with the sequences of E. longifolia or other species in the Simaroubaceae family in GenBank, indicating that the products may not be derived from E. longifolia.

The ITS region amplification was only successful for four products: TCPB, GLPB, KPB, and SAPB. However, the two remaining E. longifolia herbal products, GDPB and APBC, failed to be amplified, resulting in messy and unreadable sequences. The results of the ITS BLAST sequencing of E. longifolia products showed that only TCPB was similar to E. longifolia MG643109.1 (98.06%) and MN715379.1 (96.98%) from GenBank. In addition, the TCPB product was similar to Simaba guianensis MG643102.1 (92.39%), Homalolepis cuneata MG643083.1 (92.24%), and Hannoa chlorantha MG643108.1 (92.09%) which belong to the Simaroubaceae family (Table 4). The other products (KPB, SAPB, and GLPB) were dissimilar to the E. longifolia GenBank sequence. This pattern indicates that the TCPB product was most likely derived from E. longifolia and other products were derived from other species that are not found in the Simaroubaceae family. ITS analysis in this study also indicates the identification of Klebsiella pneumonia bacteria in GLPB (wooden cup product), urging consumers to exercise caution in the purchase and use of wooden cups as consumable items, given their potential to host such bacteria.

Of the six products analysed, only TCPB (an herbal tea product) was identified as an E. longifolia derivative based on the trnL-trnF and ITS regions, whereas the other products were derived from different plant species, indicating the potential for product mislabelling or falsification. Therefore, the DNA markers used in this study (trnL-trnF and ITS regions) were effective in tracing the authenticity of the product.

Compared to fresh plant DNA, neither the trnL-trnF nor the ITS regions were successfully amplified for all products. This inability to achieve successful DNA amplification may be attributed to DNA degradation during the manufacturing process. Various secondary metabolites, including polysaccharides, glycoproteins, polyphenolic compounds, and pigments, originating from raw materials in diverse plant tissues and organs, have been established as factors that impede DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing processes (Zahra et al., 2016). Additionally, the degradation of DNA at primer annealing sites may contribute to unsuccessful amplification of the targeted DNA barcode regions, leading to reaction failure (Newmaster et al., 2013).

Various plant species which were mixed and packaged in powder form, chips, or fine particles also contributed to amplification failure using the two selected DNA regions or products that failed to be amplified with the previous primer pairs, which had a sequence length of approximately 900 base pairs, and the use of a new primer pair for both targeted regions may be necessary to amplify shorter lengths (Little and Jeanson, 2013). Similar outcomes were observed in a previous study that had successful amplification using a shorter fragment of 500bp (Abubakar et al., 2018). Several studies have suggested that shorter DNA barcodes are more efficacious for the identification and authentication of herbal products because of their enhanced amplification efficiency (Little, 2014; Little and Jeanson, 2013).

Both products, presented as E. longifolia herbal tea with the code TCPB, were conclusively identified as E. longifolia through both the trnL-trnF region and ITS. This unequivocally establishes that the tea in question was sourced from the botanical elements of E. longifolia. The raw material for tea, comprising leaves, is notably more abundant than the E. longifolia products derived from the roots. E. longifolia tea products, distinguished by their leaf utilisation, have emerged as environmentally friendly options. This is primarily because of the sustainable nature of leaf harvesting, setting it apart from products relying on root extraction, an inherently destructive process that leads to the demise of the plant. Consequently, E. longifolia tea products derived from leaves have heightened potential for authenticity when juxtaposed with their counterparts that utilise root organs or stems.

The claim that the wooden cup originated from the root of E. longifolia remains unsubstantiated, as evidenced by both the trnL-trnF marker and ITS analysis. The cup, which measures 9 cm in diameter, requires raw material from E. longifolia roots with diameters exceeding 9 cm. Morphologically and botanically, the assertion that the cup is derived from the roots of E. longifolia appears exaggerated. Considering the morphological aspects and botanical characteristics observed during field surveys on the Sumatran mainland and the Riau Islands, E. longifolia is a small tree with an average diameter of less than 15 cm and a height not exceeding 15 m. The production of a wooden cup with a 9 cm diameter would necessitate an extensive supply of large E. longifolia roots, which is inconsistent with the abundance of E. longifolia individuals in their natural habitat in Sumatra. Molecular identification of the wooden cup product revealed that the substituted wood used in its construction belongs to a different genus within the same family. From the perspectives of availability, rarity, and conservation status, the substituted type was more accessible and abundant.

The claim regarding E. longifolia root tea in powdered form (APBC) has also been identified as not originating from the E. longifolia plant but rather from the wood organ of the rosewood plant (Dalbergia). The falsification of the powdered form is particularly straightforward, given that the powder lacks distinctive morphological features. The introduction of a bitter taste into the product can be artificially achieved, or by natural substitution of ingredients, such as those found in various species within the Dalbergia genus, which already possess a naturally bitter taste.

The claim that the herbal capsules contained E. longifolia in powdered form was disproved, as confirmed by both the trnL-trnF region and ITS analysis. Both regions recognised the product as potentially derived from different plant species, including Vernonia gigantea, Elephantopus scaber, Chanthilium cinereum, Gymnanthemum amugdalium, and Potentilla cireata. DNA marker-based identification suggested that the herbal capsules were a composite of different plant species. In Indonesia, the identified plant species constituting the herbal capsules are commonly used by the public as traditional herbal medicines or supplements. These plants are abundant on forest floors because of their herbaceous nature, and some have been cultivated intensively in home gardens or on larger scales. Despite being derived from plant species with similar herbal properties, labelling the product as E. longifolia is misleading and constitutes a fraudulent practice. Labelling products originating from E. longifolia leads to a significantly higher market value, creating a deceptive economic advantage, as products labelled based on factual information about actual plant ingredients may have a lower market value.

Similarly, the claim regarding the herbal tea made from E. longifolia roots, presented in the form of thin root shavings, lacks support from the molecular identification conducted in this study. The results of our molecular analysis indicated that the source of the raw material for the product resembled Alianthus altissima, Simarouba amara, and Geijera paniculata. Additionally, the product is suggested to be a composite of several types of raw materials, all of which are known for their herbal properties in Indonesia.

3.2. Phylogenetic analyses

Following the sequence identity results of all samples, these results were verified by phylogenetic analysis. The results of the phylogenetic tree reconstruction using the trnL-trnF gene (Fig. 1) with Castela erecta (GU593013.1) as the outgroup (Clayton et al., 2010, unpublished) indicated that TCPB clustered together with the E. longifolia leaf sample sequence, with a branch support of 0.9298. Additionally, the construction of trees in Mr. Bayes using the ITS gene (Fig. 2) with Castela emoryi (MF963835.1) as the outgroup (Thornhill et al., 2017) revealed that TCPB clustered with E. longifolia leaf samples and E. longifolia (MG643109.1) sequences from GenBank, with a branch support of 0.5944. Conversely, other product samples, namely KPB, GDPB, GLPB, SAPB, and APBC, were not grouped together with the E. longifolia leaf samples used in this study or E. longifolia in the NCBI database.

wood-52-4-343-g1
Fig. 1. A phylogenetic tree generated by trnL-trnF sequences based on Bayesian inference (Fig. created from Geneious version 2023.0 created by Biomatters. Available from: https://www.geneious.com). The number above branches are posterior probability values. The sample code corresponds to Table 1.
Download Original Figure
wood-52-4-343-g2
Fig. 2. A phylogenetic tree generated by ITS sequences based on Bayesian inference (Fig. created from Geneious Prime version 2023.0 created by Biomatters. Available from: https://www.geneious.com). The number above branches are posterior probability values. The sample code corresponds to Table 1. ITS: internal transcribed spacer.
Download Original Figure

Using trnL-trnF primers, BLASTn analysis revealed that among those tested, only the TCPB sample exhibited 100% similarity to E. longifolia species (Ng et al., 2019; MH751519). BLASTn also identified other TCPB species (Table 4), indicating the possibility of adulteration with other substitutes or products. The presence of substituted products may result in barcodes that differ from the labels assigned to the tested herbal products (Abubakar et al., 2018; Newmaster et al., 2013). As shown in Fig. 1, Bayesian analysis indicated that among the tested herbal products samples, only TCPB formed a monophyletic clade that was strongly supported (0.9909) by the E. longifolia reference sequence derived from this study. 02EL, 06 EL, 07 EL, 08 EL, 09EL, 10EL, 5PEL, 6 PEL, 7 PEL, A83EL, PU 10TN, PU12TN, PU14 SH, PU21 SH, PU2DF, PU3T, PU4T, PU6DG, PU7D, PU7SH, PU8TN, PU9DG, R1EL and other sequences of E. longifolia obtained from the GenBank repository (MH751519.1). This study demonstrated the authenticity of the tested herbal product samples. However, several species were clustered in the same clade: Paranephelius ovatus AB355578, Paranephelius uniflorus AB355582, Pseudonoseris szyszylowiczii AB355590, V. gigantea GU818102, C. cinereum MZ958830. These findings suggest that while trnL-trnF can be adequately amplified across a diverse range of plants, its variability may not be sufficient for species discrimination, as suggested by de Groot et al. (2011).

BLASTn analysis of the ITS barcoding regions indicated that only one of the tested herbal product samples (TCPB) exhibited a > 88% match with E. longifolia (Table 4). Nevertheless, the BLASTn results revealed that TCPB harboured a DNA barcode from a different species, contrary to the labelled sample information. TCPB also has 87%–88% similarity with S. guianensis MG643102.1, H. cuneata MG643083.1, and H. chlorantha MG643108.1. Referring to Fig. 2, the Bayesian analysis of the ITS region in E. longifolia revealed that one of the tested HP samples (TCPB) formed a cluster with the E. longifolia reference sequence established in the current study (PU6DG, PU7SH, PU4T, PU7D, PU4D, PU8TN, PU3T, PU2D, PU2DG, PU8N, PU9DG, PU1T, PU10TN, R2, PU21SH, PU14SH, PU13N, PU12TN, PU11N, 8PEL, 7PEL, 6PEL, 5PEL, 4PEL, 04, 03, 02, 1 PEL) and other E. longifolia sequences retrieved from the GenBank database (MG643109). This result indicated that TCPB did contained E. longifolia. Other tested HP samples were positioned outside the clade of the reference samples, suggesting that these herbal medicinal products (HMPs) harboured plant species that were different from those declared on their packaging labels.

The Bayesian results for both trnL-trnF and ITS demonstrated that the other five HP-tested samples clustered not with E. longifolia but with S. glauca, Homalolepis subcymora, E. scaber, and Simaba. S. glauca is a flowering tree that is native to Florida, South America, and the Caribbean. The tree is well suited to warm, humid, and tropical regions such as Indonesia. E. scaber (locally known as tapak liman) is a plant that can be easily found in Indonesia, including Southeast Celebes (Choi and Hwang, 2005).

The Bayesian analysis results aligned with those of the BLASTn, demonstrating that the tested HPs containing E. longifolia clustered together, while those lacking E. longifolia, contrary to the labelled information, formed a distinct clade. Thus, both the BLASTn and Bayesian tree methods effectively differentiated between HMPs containing E. longifolia and those without HMPs (Zhao et al., 2013).

In the context of DNA barcoding in this study, only one of the six tested HPs (TCPB) was identified as authentic based on the criteria from BLASTn and Bayesian tree analyses, indicating possible counterfeiting or adulteration in five of the tested HPs. As emphasised by Zhao et al. (2013), any new method for identifying traditional medicines should prioritise accuracy, digitisation, repeatability, simplicity, and practicality. Compared with traditional methods, holds significant importance because of its ability to identify species in various forms, such as dried herbs, leaves, and roots, without being restricted by morphological characteristics.

Our study suggests that the trnL-trnF and ITS regions are promising DNA barcodes for authenticating E. longifolia HMPs because of their short sizes. An ideal marker should be short enough to amplify degraded DNA, produce high-quality sequences, and possess robust variability for sample discrimination (Li et al., 2015; Vijayan and Tsou, 2010). The ITS region, confirmed by various researchers, including (Gao et al., 2010; Han et al., 2016), stands out as one of the best DNA barcode regions for the identification and authentication of medicinal plants. Chen et al. (2010) conducted an extensive study to identify the ITS2 region as the most suitable for medicinal plant identification, with a success rate of 92.7% in 6,600 samples and closely related species. In another study by He et al. (2012), which analysed 109 samples with five DNA barcode regions, the ITS and ITS2 regions were found to be the most effective among the tested regions.

This study marks the pioneering use of DNA barcode molecular identification technology to identify E. longifolia and its adulterants, thereby extending the application of trnL-trnF and ITS sequences to medicinal plants, particularly in Indonesia. Mislabelling observed in certain products constitutes a form of fraud, as consumers rely on product labels for expected benefits. Olivar et al. (2016) exemplified this by documenting instances where Vitex negundo (Lamiaceae) was substituted with contaminants, such as Moringa olifeira (Moringaceae) and Mormodica charantia (Cucurbitaceae), despite being medicinal plants, as revealed through DNA barcoding. Similar occurrences emerged in the current study, where products labelled as E. longifolia actually contained other species, such as Homalolepis, Elephantopus, and Simaba, potentially harbouring different natural compounds compared to E. longifolia. Notably, the identification of Dalbergia sp. as a substituted species in a product claimed to be derived from the roots of E. longifolia is intriguing, given its classification into a different plant family and its lack of known aphrodisiac benefits. This indirect form of adulteration, which involves the use of abundant and easily accessible materials to maximise profits, has been documented by Satheeshkumar et al. (2016).

Authenticating commercial products with incorrect species poses challenges, particularly when their forms are altered, such as powdered capsules or dried plant materials for tea. These alterations compromised the morphological characteristics and diminished the aroma due to volatile evaporation. Nevertheless, utilising an appropriate DNA extraction method capable of yielding high-purity DNA allows for amplification even from minute DNA samples. The Bayesian tree analysis in the present study effectively distinguished between E. longifolia and the other species.

4. CONCLUSIONS

DNA barcoding is a rapid and reliable method for authenticating herbal products derived from E. longifolia. This study showed that herbal products of E. longifolia available in the Indonesian market are subject to adulteration or substitution potentially stemming from inaccuracies in species identification. This study also strongly advocates the prompt integration of DNA barcoding as a mechanism for identifying instances of species adulteration to improve the production of high-quality herbal products. Consequently, DNA barcoding should be included in the quality control measures of government certification bodies to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of product authenticity and to ensure the safety of the herbal products consumed. This will provide nuanced insights into the safety and efficacy of these products.

CONFLICT of INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank the Directorate of Research and Community Service, Ministry of Research and Technology, and the National Research and Innovation Agency, Republic of Indonesia for providing a research grant through the Penelitian Dasar Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi (PDUPT) scheme (Number: 12/E1/KP. PTNBH/2022).

REFERENCES

1.

Abdullah, A., Nurilmala, M., Jacoeb, A.M., Sitaresmi, K.P. 2019. Mini DNA-barcode as molecular marker for heavily processed hairtail fish products authentication. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 278: 012001.

2.

Abubakar, B.M., Salleh, F.M., Omar, M.S.S., Wagiran, A. 2018. Assessing product adulteration of Eurycoma longifolia (Tongkat ali) herbal medicinal product using DNA barcoding and HPLC analysis. Pharmaceutical Biology 56(1): 368-377.

3.

Ang, H.H., Hitotsuyanagi, Y., Takeya, K. 2000. Eurycolactones A–C, novel quassinoids from Eurycoma longifolia. Tetrahedron Letters 41(35): 6849-6853.

4.

Bhat, R., Karim, A.A. 2010. Tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia Jack): A review on its ethnobotany and pharmacological importance. Fitoterapia 81(7): 669-679.

5.

Chen, S., Yao, H., Han, J., Liu, C., Song, J., Shi, L., Zhu, Y., Ma, X., Gao, T., Pang, X., Luo, K., Li, Y., Li, X., Jia, X., Lin, Y., Leon, C. 2010. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLOS ONE 5(1): e8613.

6.

Choi, E.M., Hwang, J.K. 2005. Screening of Indonesian medicinal plants for inhibitor activity on nitric oxide production of RAW264.7 cells and antioxidant activity. Fitoterapia 76(2): 194-203.

7.

Chua, L.S.L., Kamarudin, S., Markandan, M., Hamidah, M. 2005. A preliminary checklist of vascular plants from the Machinchang range, Pulau Langkawi, Peninsular Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal 57(2): 155-172.

8.

Coutinho Moraes, D.F., Still, D.W., Lum, M.R., Hirsch, A.M. 2015. DNA-based authentication of botanicals and plant-derived dietary supplements: Where have we been and where are we going? Planta Medica 81(09): 687-695.

9.

de Groot, G.A., During, H.J., Maas, J.W., Schneider, H., Vogel, J.C., Erkens, R.H.J. 2011. Use of rbcL and trnL-F as a two-locus DNA barcode for identification of NW-European ferns: An ecological perspective. PLOS ONE 6(1): e16371.

10.

Devecchi, M.F., Thomas, W.W., Plunkett, G.M., Pirani, J.R. 2018. Testing the monophyly of Simaba (Simaroubaceae): Evidence from five molecular regions and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 120: 63-82.

11.

Dilley, K., Chapman, B. 2019. Optimising silica-based solid phase DNA extraction methods for low concentration forensic samples. Ph.D. Thesis, Murdoch University, Australia.

12.

Elkordy, A.A., Haj-Ahmad, R.R., Awaad, A.S., Zaki, R.M. 2021. An overview on natural product drug formulations from conventional medicines to nanomedicines: Past, present and future. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 63: 102459.

13.

Evans Schultes, R. 1980. Medicinal plants of East and Southeast Asia: Attributed properties. Economic Botany 34(4): 361.

14.

Fadzil, N.F., Wagiran, A., Salleh, F.M., Abdullah, S., Izham, N.H.M. 2018. Authenticity testing and detection of Eurycoma longifolia in commercial herbal products using bar-high resolution melting analysis. Genes 9(8): 408.

15.

Fatima, T., Srivastava, A., Hanur, V.S., Rao, M.S. 2018. An effective wood DNA extraction protocol for three economic important timber species of India. American Journal of Plant Sciences 9(2): 139-149.

16.

Finkeldey, R., Leinemann, L., Gailing, O. 2010. Molecular genetic tools to infer the origin of forest plants and wood. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 85(5): 1251-1258.

17.

Ganie, S.H., Upadhyay, P., Das, S., Prasad Sharma, M. 2015. Authentication of medicinal plants by DNA markers. Plant Gene 4: 83-99.

18.

Gao, T., Yao, H., Song, J., Liu, C., Zhu, Y., Ma, X., Pang, X., Xu, H., Chen, S. 2010. Identification of medicinal plants in the family Fabaceae using a potential DNA barcode ITS2. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130(1): 116-121.

19.

Gautam, P., Pandey, A.K., Gupta, A., Dubey, S.K. 2023. Microcosm-omics centric investigation reveals elevated bacterial degradation of imidacloprid. Environmental Pollution 324: 121402.

20.

Han, J., Pang, X., Liao, B., Yao, H., Song, J., Chen, S. 2016. An authenticity survey of herbal medicines from markets in China using DNA barcoding. Scientific Reports 6(1): 1-9.

21.

He, Y., Hou, P., Fan, G., Song, Z., Arain, S., Shu, H., Tang, C., Yue, Q., Zhang, Y. 2012. Authentication of Angelica anomala Avé-Lall cultivars through DNA barcodes. Mitochondrial DNA 23(2): 100-105.

22.

Howard, C., Hill, E., Kreuzer, M., Mali, P., Masiero, E., Slater, A., Sgamma, T. 2019. DNA authentication of St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) commercial products targeting the ITS region. Genes 10(4): 1-20.

23.

Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17(8): 754-755.

24.

Insuasti-Cruz, E., Suárez-Jaramillo, V., Mena Urresta, K.A., Pila-Varela, K.O., Fiallos-Ayala, X., Dahoumane, S.A., Alexis, F. 2022. Natural biomaterials from biodiversity for healthcare applications. Advanced Healthcare Materials 11(1): 2101389.

25.

Jung, J., Kim, K.H., Yang, K., Bang, K.H., Yang, T.J. 2014. Practical application of DNA markers for high-throughput authentication of Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius from commercial ginseng products. Journal of Ginseng Research 38(2): 123-129.

26.

Kassim, A.R., Niiyama, K., Ripin, A., Appanah, S., Iida, S. 2002. Species assembly and site preference of tree species in a primary seraya-ridge forest of peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 14: 287-303.

27.

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Tamura, K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870-1874.

28.

Kuo, P.C., Damu, A.G., Lee, K.H., Wu, T.S. 2004. Cytotoxic and antimalarial constituents from the roots of Eurycoma longifolia. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 12(3): 537-544.

29.

Lee, S.Y., Lamasudin, D.U., Mohamed, R. 2019. Rapid detection of several endangered agarwood-producing Aquilaria species and their potential adulterants using plant DNA barcodes coupled with high-resolution melting (Bar-HRM) analysis. Holzforschung 73(5): 435-444.

30.

Li, C.H., Liao, J.W., Liao, P.L., Huang, W.K., Tse, L.S., Lin, C.H., Kang, J.J., Cheng, Y.W. 2013. Evaluation of acute 13-week subchronic toxicity and genotoxicity of the powdered root of Tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia Jack). Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2013(1): 102987.

31.

Li, N., Shen, Q., Wang, J., Han, C., Ji, R., Li, F., Jiang, T. 2015. Tetrodotoxin detection and species identification of pufferfish in retail roasted fish fillet by DNA barcoding in China. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A 32(12): 2148-2153.

32.

Liang, H. 2020. Evolutionary and ecological processes influence a plant-bumble bee network.

33.

Liepelt, S., Sperisen, C., Deguilloux, M.F., Petit, R.J., Kissling, R., Spencer, M., De Beaulieu, J.L., Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Ziegenhagen, B. 2006. Authenticated DNA from ancient wood remains. Annals of Botany 98(5): 1107-1111.

34.

Liow, H.L., Ahmad Tarmizi, A.A., Jahari, P.N.S., Ihsan, N., Mohd Salleh, F. 2021. DNA barcoding for authentication of Orthosiphon stamineus herbal medicinal product using ITS2 nuclear marker originating from Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 736: 012034.

35.

Little, D.P. 2014. Authentication of Ginkgo biloba herbal dietary supplements using DNA barcoding. Genome 57: 513-516.

36.

Little, D.P., Jeanson, M.L. 2013. DNA barcode authentication of saw palmetto herbal dietary supplements. Scientific Reports 3(1): 1-6.

37.

Mahfudh, N., Pihie, A.H.L. 2008. Eurycomanone induces apoptosis through the up-regulation of p53 in human cervical carcinoma cells. Journal of Cancer Molecules 4(4): 109-115.

38.

McDonald, C.M., Keeling, S.E., Brewer, M.J., Hathaway, S.C. 2018. Using chemical and DNA marker analysis to authenticate a high-value food, manuka honey. npj Science of Food 2(1):9.

39.

Miyake, K., Tezuka, Y., Awale, S., Li, F., Kadota, S. 2009. Quassinoids from Eurycoma longifolia. Journal of Natural Products 72(12): 2135-2140.

40.

Mohammed Abubakar, B., Mohd Salleh, F., Shamsir Omar, M.S., Wagiran, A. 2017. Review: DNA barcoding and chromatography fingerprints for the authentication of botanicals in herbal medicinal products. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2017(1): 1352948.

41.

Möller, M., Cronk, Q.C.B. 1997. Origin and relationships of Saintpaulia (Gesneriaceae) based on ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. American Journal of Botany 84(7): 956-965.

42.

Muellner-Riehl, A.N., Weeks, A., Clayton, J.W., Buerki, S., Nauheimer, L., Chiang, Y.C., Cody, S., Pell, S.K. 2016. Molecular phylogenetics and molecular clock dating of Sapindales based on plastid rbcL, atpB and trnL-trnF DNA sequences. Taxon 65(5): 1019-1036.

43.

Newmaster, S.G., Grguric, M., Shanmughanandhan, D., Ramalingam, S., Ragupathy, S. 2013. DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Medicine 11: 222.

44.

Ng, W.L., Lee, S.Y., Yeap, S.K. 2019. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of an important Southeast Asian medicinal plant, Eurycoma longifolia (Simaroubaceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B: Resources 4(1): 128-129.

45.

Noh, P., Kim, W.J., Yang, S., Park, I., Moon, B.C. 2018. Authentication of the herbal medicine angelicae dahuricae radix using an its sequence-based multiplex scar assay. Molecules 23(9): 2134.

46.

Nyakudya, T.T., Tshabalala, T., Dangarembizi, R., Erlwanger, K.H., Ndhlala, A.R. 2020. The potential therapeutic value of medicinal plants in the management of metabolic disorders. Molecules 25(11): 1-20.

47.

Olivar, J.E.C., Alaba, J.P.E.P., Atienza, J.F.M., Tan, J.J.S., Umali, M.T., Alejandro, G.J.D. 2016. Establishment of a standard reference material (SRM) herbal DNA barcode library of Vitex negundo L. (lagundi) for quality control measures. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A 33(5): 741-748.

48.

Pasaribu, G., Winarni, I., Gusti, R.E.P., Maharani, R., Fernandes, A., Harianja, A.H., Saragih, G.S., Turjaman, M., Tampubolon, A.P., Kuspradini, H., Lukmandaru, G., Njurumana, G.N., Sukito, A., Aswandi, A., Kholibrina, C.R. 2021. Current challenges and prospects of Indonesian non-timber forest products (NTFPs): A review. Forests 12(12): 1743.

49.

Pelser, P.B., Kennedy, A.H., Tepe, E.J., Shidler, J.B., Nordenstam, B., Kadereit, J.W., Watson, L.E. 2010. Patterns and causes of incongruence between plastid and nuclear Senecioneae (Asteraceae) phylogenies. American Journal of Botany 97(5): 856-873.

50.

Psifidi, A., Dovas, C.I., Bramis, G., Lazou, T., Russel, C.L., Arsenos, G., Banos, G. 2015. Comparison of eleven methods for genomic DNA extraction suitable for large-scale whole-genome genotyping and long-term DNA banking using blood samples. PLOS ONE 10(1): 1-18.

51.

Rachmat, H.H., Yulita, K.S., Dwiyanti, F.G., Susilowati, A., Arrofaha, N., Susila, Kamal, I., Siregar, I.Z. 2024. Optimizing DNA extraction and selecting suitable regions for biodiversity assessment: A study on Shorea leprosula. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 30(1): 144-154.

52.

Rachmayanti, Y., Leinemann, L., Gailing, O., Finkeldey, R. 2006. Extraction, amplification and characterization of wood DNA from Dipterocarpaceae. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 24(1): 45-55.

53.

Satheeshkumar, N., Paul, D., Lingesh, A. 2016. Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (LC–MS): Approaches to Adulterant Detection in Herbal Products. In: Medicinal Plants: Recent Advances in Research and Development, Ed. by Tsay, H.S., Shyur, L.F., Agrawal, D.C., Wu, Y.C., and Wang, S.Y. Springer, Singapore. pp. 73-95

54.

Sihotang, V.B.L., Rahmawati, K. 2019. The politics of stake collection and trading business of pasak bumi: The strategy of Alam Lestari Trading Business and community of pasak bumi collectors in Bahorok District, North Sumatra. In: Bogor, Indonesia, Proceedings of the National Seminar on Conservation and Utilization of Wild Plants and Animals: Research as the Foundation for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Wild Plants and Animals.

55.

Soares, S., Amaral, J.S., Oliveira, M.B.P.P., Mafra, I. 2017. A comprehensive review on the main honey authentication issues: Production and origin. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 16(5): 1072-1100.

56.

Song, Y., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Li, W., Li, M. 2019. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome sequence of Dalbergia species and its phylogenetic implications. Scientific Reports 9(1): 20401.

57.

Susilowati, A., Rachmat, H.H., Yulita, K.S., Elfiati, D., Ginting, I.M. 2021. Distribution and association pattern of pasak bumi (Eurycoma longifolia) in Batang Lubu Sutam District, Padang Lawas, North Sumatra. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 912(1): 1-7.

58.

Suwardi, A.B., Navia, Z.I., Harmawan, T., Syamsuardi, S., Mukhtar, E. 2022. Importance and local conservation of wild edible fruit plants in the east Aceh Region, Indonesia. International Journal of Conservation Science 13(1): 221-232.

59.

Swetha, V.P., Parvathy, V.A., Sheeja, T.E., Sasikumar, B. 2014. Isolation and amplification of genomic DNA from barks of Cinnamomum spp. Turkish Journal of Biology 38(1): 151-155.

60.

Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G., Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17(5): 1105-1109.

61.

Tang, N., Li, Y., Yao, S., Hu, J., Zhao, Y., Fu, S., Song, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, G., Wei, D., Li, C., Jia, R., Feng, J. 2023. Epidemicity and clonal replacement of hypervirulent carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with diverse pathotypes and resistance profiles in a hospital. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance 32: 4-10.

62.

Theodoridis, S., Drakou, E.G., Hickler, T., Thines, M., Nogues-Bravo, D. 2023. Evaluating natural medicinal resources and their exposure to global change. The Lancet Planetary Health 7(2): E155-E163.

63.

Thornhill, A.H., Baldwin, B.G., Freyman, W.A., Nosratinia, S., Kling, M.M., Morueta-Holme, N., Madsen, T.P., Ackerly, D.D., Mishler, B.D. 2017. Spatial phylogenetics of the native California flora. BMC Biology 15(1): 1-18.

64.

Tran, T.V.A., Malainer, C., Schwaiger, S., Atanasov, A.G., Heiss, E.H., Dirsch, V.M., Stuppner, H. 2014. NF-κB inhibitors from Eurycoma longifolia. Journal of Natural Products 77(3): 483-488.

65.

Vejayan, J., Mohamed, A.N., Zulkifli, A.A., Yahya, Y.A.C., Munir, N., Yusoff, M.M. 2018. Marker to authenticate Eurycoma longifolia (Tongkat ali) containing aphrodisiac herbal products. Current Science 115(5): 886-894.

66.

Verbylaitė, R., Beišys, P., Rimas, V., Kuusienė, S. 2010. Comparison of ten DNA extraction protocols from wood of European aspen (Populus tremula L.). Baltic Forestry 16(1): 35-42.

67.

Verpoorte, R., Choi, Y.H., Mustafa, N.R., Kim, H.K. 2008. Metabolomics: Back to basics. Phytochemistry Reviews 7(3): 525-537.

68.

Vijayan, K., Tsou, C.H. 2010. DNA barcoding in plants: Taxonomy in a new perspective. Current Science 99(11): 1530-1541.

69.

Zahra, N.B., Shinwari, Z.K., Qaiser, M. 2016. DNA barcoding: A tool for standardization of herbal medicinal products (HMPs) of Lamiaceae from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 48(5): 2167-2174.

70.

Zhao, X., Pang, S., Shan, T., Liu, F. 2013. Applications of three DNA barcodes in assorting intertidal red macroalgal flora in Qingdao, China. Journal of Ocean University of China 12(1): 139-145.

71.

Zhou, F., Lan, K., Li, X., Mei, Y., Cai, S., Wang, J. 2021. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Vernonia amygdalina Delile. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 6(3): 1134-1135.