Table 4.
Flexural performance significance verification result of Ply-lam CLT using larch lamina
| Flexural performance | Plywood joint method | Average | Standard deviation | F-value |
Non-adhesive | MOR(unit: MPa) | Control | 61.6 | 8.5 | 4.569*(0.058) |
Butt joint | 52.4 | 2 |
Half Lap joint | 52.1 | 0.2 |
Tongue & Groove joint | 52.2 | 0.5 |
MOE(unit: GPa) | Control | 15.1 | 0.6 | 127.6***(0.086) |
Butt joint | 9.1 | 0.7 |
Half Lap joint | 9.0 | 0.5 |
Tongue & Groove joint | 9.2 | 0.2 |
Adhesive | MOR(unit: MPa) | Control | 61.6 | 8.5 | 4.507*(0.059) |
Butt joint | 52.5 | 2.1 |
Half Lap joint | 52.1 | 0.2 |
Tongue & Groove joint | 52.2 | 0.5 |
MOE(unit: GPa) | Control | 15.1 | 0.6 | 179.707***(0.997) |
Butt joint | 9.3 | 0.5 |
Half Lap joint | 9.1 | 0.2 |
Tongue & Groove joint | 9.3 | 0.4 |
- ( ) vale: F-value result according to the plywood joint method excluding control
- : p<0.05
**: p<0.01
: p<0.001