Table 3.
Flexural performance significance verification result of Ply-lam CLT using douglas fir lamina
| Flexural performance | Plywood joint method | Average | Standard deviation | F-value |
Non-adhesive | MOR(unit: MPa) | Control | 65.5 | 6.7 | 1.434(1.315) |
Butt joint | 65.1 | 8.6 |
Half Lap joint | 57.6 | 7.5 |
Tongue & Groove joint | 58.2 | 5.3 |
MOE(unit: GPa) | Control | 13.0 | 0.8 | 6.828*(0.403) |
Butt joint | 11.5 | 0.5 |
Half Lap joint | 11.2 | 0.8 |
Tongue & Groove joint | 11.5 | 0.4 |
Adhesive | MOR(unit: MPa) | Control | 65.5 | 6.7 | 2.186(3.807) |
Butt joint | 68.6 | 6.3 |
Half Lap joint | 70.6 | 5 |
Tongue & Groove joint | 61.2 | 3.4 |
MOE(unit: GPa) | Control | 13.0 | 0.8 | 7.405**(1.466) |
Butt joint | 11.8 | 0.5 |
Half Lap joint | 11.4 | 0.7 |
Tongue & Groove joint | 11.1 | 0.5 |
- ( ) vale: F-value result according to the plywood joint method excluding control
- : p<0.05
: p<0.01
***: p<0.001