Influence of Adding Silicon Dioxide in Particleboard from Teak Sawdust to Reduce Water Absorption and Thickness Swelling

WANISHDILOKRATN, Thiti; WANISHDILOKRATN, Jirapa

doi:10.5658/WOOD.2024.52.5.438

J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2024; 52(5):438-449

pISSN: 1017-0715, eISSN: 2233-7180

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2024.52.5.438

Original Article

Influence of Adding Silicon Dioxide in Particleboard from Teak Sawdust to Reduce Water Absorption and Thickness Swelling

Thiti WANISHDILOKRATN¹^,^†

, Jirapa WANISHDILOKRATN²

Author Information & Copyright ▼

¹Department of Forest Industry Technology, Maejo University Phrae Campus, Phrae 54140, Thailand

²Protected Area Regional Office 13 Phrae, Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Phrae 54000, Thailand

^†Corresponding author: Thiti WANISHDILOKRATN (e-mail: Thiti_jk@hotmail.com)

Copyright 2024 The Korean Society of Wood Science & Technology. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 12, 2024; Revised: Jun 12, 2024; Accepted: Jun 28, 2024

Published Online: Sep 25, 2024

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the influence of silicon dioxide (SiO₂) addition to particleboard from teak sawdust to reduce water absorption and thickness swelling using standard tests of physical and mechanical properties. The experiment had a completely randomized design with four treatments (SiO₂ concentrations of 5%, 3%, 1%, and 0%), each with three replicates, for a total of 12 conditions. The results showed that 1% concentration was the optimal concentration to reduce both water absorption (32.42% ± 1.78%) and thickness swelling (8.65% ± 1.16%). The product passed the standard tests for physical and mechanical properties, which reduced the cost of the SiO₂ content for particleboard processing. These results suggest that SiO₂ can resist moisture content but may slightly reduce strength.

Keywords: concentration; density; mechanical property; moisture content; physical property; silicon dioxide; Tectona grandis

1. INTRODUCTION

Forest resources in Thailand are dwindling because of the rising demand for their utilization (Flaherty and Filipchuk, 1993; Rout, 2018; Salam et al., 2006). Wood is a renewable and sustainable material that has remained a vital resource from the past to the present (Blanchet and Breton, 2020; Goldhahn et al., 2021; Schubert et al., 2023). The development of wood utilization has been continuous, encompassing activities such as logging, sawmilling, and wood processing (Borz et al., 2021; Kunickaya et al., 2022; Namuene and Egbe, 2022) for products that meet consumer needs. In northern Thailand, teak (Tectona grandis), a member of the Lamiaceae family, is commonly used (Asanok et al., 2024; Li and Olmstead, 2017). Teak wood has high quality, medium density (D), moderate strength, and high durability (Miranda et al., 2011; Seta et al., 2023; Wanneng et al., 2014). In addition, teak wood has beautiful grains and is easy to process, making it popular for creating various types of furniture (Bouaphavong et al., 2023; Damayanti et al., 2018; Wanneng et al., 2021).

Phrae Province is a key hub for the teak industry in northern Thailand, ranging from small-scale household production to large factories that export teak wood products nationwide (Kaakkurivaara et al., 2022; Kanthawong et al., 2023). This favorable environment makes Phrae a prime source of high-quality teak, involving a significant local population in teak furniture production and distribution (Buareal et al., 2020; Thulasidas and Bhat, 2012). Consequently, many people in the province are involved in the production and sale of teakwood-based furniture. Popular furniture products include tables, chairs, beds, cabinets, altar tables, Buddhist pedestals, and various household items such as wooden trays, coasters, wooden toys, and bowls (Klinpikul and Srichandr, 2009; Laemlaksakul and Sangsai, 2013; Scott, 2008). As a result, the production of these furniture items generates a substantial amount of wood scrap and teak sawdust (Egwutvongsa, 2023; Griyanitasari and Pahlawan, 2020) primarily disposed of through burning. This practice significantly contributes to air pollution, including fine particulate matter (PM2.5; ChooChuay et al., 2020; Peter and Nagendra, 2021; Takaoka et al., 2016). This is a significant factor affecting the respiratory system of people in the area, leading to various associated health problems such as itching, respiratory issues, and lung cancer (Liu et al., 2017, 2022; Nakhjirgan et al., 2019; Sukuman et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2022).

Particleboard from teak sawdust is a sustainable alternative to traditional wood with the aim of reducing waste (Chauhan et al., 2021; Ikubanni et al., 2018). However, challenges arise, such as water absorption (WA) and swelling, owing to the high thickness of the panels used in the market, which reduces their lifespan (Chaydarreh et al., 2022; Istek et al., 2019; Nourbakhsh, 2010; Rivela et al., 2006; Viswanathan et al., 2000) and leading to issues such as mold and termite infestation (Acda and Cabangon, 2013; Chotikhun et al., 2018; Garzón-Barrero et al., 2016). Researchers have addressed this issue by incorporating silicone dioxide (SiO₂) into particleboards to reduce these problems. SiO₂ is a hydrophobic substance capable of resisting moisture and has a very low risk of toxicity. It is in the powder form, making it easy to handle and inexpensive. When mixed with an adhesive during the panel production process, SiO₂ improves the water resistance and dimensional stability (Alam et al., 2014; Boostani and Modirrousta, 2016; Fu et al., 2023; Karim et al., 2017; Nazerian et al., 2018; Nortuy et al., 2018). Researchers have been interested in using teak sawdust waste to produce particleboards by adding an appropriate amount of SiO₂ to reduce WA and thickness swelling (TS). We conducted tests on both the physical and mechanical properties according to the standards used for compressed wood panels. This serves as a strategy to utilize leftover waste and reduce waste accumulation in communities, which causes various diseases. Moreover, this approach could lead to sustainable industrial development.

2. MATERIALS and METHODS

2.1. Wood sample preparation

Teak sawdust from a private teak plantation was obtained from a wood factory in the Sungmen District, Phrae Province, Thailand, as shown in Fig. 1. The particleboard was processed, and its properties were tested at the Maejo University Phrae Campus, Phrae Province, Thailand. The sawdust was screened using a sieve with a diameter of 7 mm. The mixture was then dried to adjust its moisture content (MC) to approximately 10%. After that, the urea formaldehyde adhesive (viscosity at 30°C ranges from 200–240 centipoise, specific gravity at 30°C ranges from 1.28–1.31, and pH ranges from 8.0–9.5) from Thai Chemical Corporation (Samutprakarn, Thailand), is mixed with a quantity of 10% of the dry weight of the wood piece, along with ammonium chloride (Molecular Weight is 53.49 g/mol and pH is 5) from Thai Chemical Corporation used as a hardening agent, which constitutes 2% of the adhesive weight and SiO₂ from Krungthepchemi (Bangkok, Thailand) of 5%, 3%, 1%, and 0% of the adhesive weight per board. The particles were formed into a single-layer panel using a forming box (450 × 450 mm). The particles were then sprayed and mixed in an adhesive mixer for 5 min. Afterwards, it was hot pressed at a pressure of 35 kg per square cm with a pressing temperature of 120°C for 5 min (the desired D is approximately 680 kg/m³), then all boards were conditioned in a humidity-controlled room at 25°C for 7 d or until the weight of the particleboard remains constant as shown in Fig. 2. The experiment had a completely randomized design with four treatments (SiO₂ concentrations of 5%, 3%, 1%, and 0%), and there were 12 conditions with three replicates per treatment.

Fig. 1. Teak sawdust of a private teak plantation.

Download Original Figure

Fig. 2. Particleboard from teak sawdust with different concentrations of SiO₂. (a) 5%, (b) 3%, (c) 1%, and (d) 0%. SiO₂: silicone dioxide.

Download Original Figure

2.2. Data collection

Particleboards were evaluated according to the JIS A5908: Japanese Industrial Standard for Particleboards (JIS, 2003). The physical properties of the particleboard included the MC, D, WA, and TS. The samples were evaluated with dimensions of 50 mm × 50 mm × 10 mm. The MC and D were dried at 103 ± 2°C for 24 hours, The change in MC was determined as the difference between before and after treatment. MC and D were calculated from the weight and volume using Equations (1) and (2), respectively:

MC (%) = (M 1 − M 2) / M 2 × 100

(1)

D (kg / m 3) = (W 1 / V) × 106

(2)

Where M₁ and M₂ are the weights in g before and after treatment, respectively, and V is the volume of the sample in mm³.

WA and TS were immersed in water for 24 h at room temperature. The values were then estimated based on the differences in the thickness and weight of the specimens before and after water immersion. WA and TS were computed according to Equations (3) and (4):

WA (%) = [(W 2 − W 1) / W 1] × 100

(3)

TS (%) = [(T 2 − T 1) / T 1] × 100

(4)

Where W₁ and W₂ are the weights before and after immersion, respectively, in grams, and T₁ and T₂ are the thicknesses before and after immersion, respectively, in millimeters.

The mechanical properties of particleboard include internal bonding (IB), modulus of rupture (MOR), and modulus of elasticity (MOE). The IB samples were evaluated on a 50 mm × 50 mm × 10 mm plate, and the tensile strength was tested using a universal testing machine. The IB was calculated according to Equation (5).

IB (MPa) = F / (W × L)

(5)

Where F is the maximum load (N), W is the width of the sample (mm), and L is the length (mm).

The MOR and MOE samples measured 200 mm × 50 mm × 10 mm. The span was set to 150 mm, and the loading speed was set to 10 mm/min using a universal testing machine. The MOR and MOE were calculated using Equations (6) and (7):

MOR (MPa) = (3 × P max × L) / (2 × b × h 2) .

(6)

MOE (MPa) = (P × L 3) / (4 × D × b × h 3) .

(7)

Where P denotes the load in N, P_max denotes the maximum load in N, L denotes the span in mm, b denotes the breadth in mm, h denotes the depth of the test specimen in mm, and D denotes the deflection at the proportionality limit in mm.

2.3. Data analysis

Statistical differences in MC, D, WA, TS, IB, MOR, and MOE between treatments were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan’s new multiple range test. The physical and mechanical properties of the particleboard were determined using SPSS for Windows (version 26.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. RESULTS and DISCUSSION

3.1. Physical properties with the addition of silicone dioxide in particleboard from teak sawdust

The MC of the particleboard was less than 12%. The lowest content was found with 5% concentration (7.83 ± 5.72%), followed by 3% concentration (8.60 ± 3.08%), 1% concentration (8.94 ± 4.75%), and 0% concentration (9.89 ± 1.98%); these contents were all insignificant (p < 0.05). Moreover, the D of the particleboard ranged from to 400–900 kg/m³. The highest D was found with 5% concentration (689.92 ± 21.20 kg/m³), followed by 3% concentration (688.90 ± 20.61 kg/m³), 1% concentration (686.39 ± 22.37 kg/m³), and 0% concentration (685.12 ± 29.81 kg/m³); these densities were all insignificant (p < 0.05). In contrast, the WA of particleboard was less than 40%. The lowest WA was found with 5% concentration (30.98 ± 2.94%), followed by 3% concentration (32.03 ± 1.24%), and 1% concentration (32.42 ± 1.78%), these WAs were all significant (p < 0.05) compared to the 0% concentration (38.83 ± 2.89%). The swelling thickness of the particleboard iwas < 12%. The lowest TS was found with 5% concentration (7.73 ± 1.12%), followed by 3% concentration (8.36 ± 1.07%), and 1% concentration (8.65 ± 1.16%); these WAs were all significant (p < 0.05) compared to the 0% concentration (10.95 ± 0.90%), as shown in Tables 1–3. These results are similar to those reported by Hartono et al. (2022) and Iswanto et al. (2013). The particleboards had a MC of less than 10%. The MC and SiO₂ quantity in particleboard result in dimensional stability (Dukarska and Derkowski, 2014; Dukarska et al., 2022; Korai et al., 1999). Putra et al. (2022) and Zakaria et al. (2021) reported that the D ranged from 650–850 kg/m³ but was lower than that of particleboard with polyurethane variation ranging from to 825–1,261 kg/m³ (Masturi et al., 2020). According to de Souza et al. (2022) and Yang et al. (2023), particleboard has a WA value of approximately 30%, and TS ranges from 8.67%–11.74%. Valle et al. (2020) reported that particleboards with SiO₂ showed reduced TS and improved dimensional stability without compromising the mechanical properties owing to the superior hydrophobic properties of SiO₂ compared to commercial particleboards (Amali et al., 2021; Banciu et al., 2023; Meng et al., 2020).

Table 1. Moisture content, density, water absorption and thickness swelling of particleboard under different concentrations of SiO₂

Concentration (%)	MC (%)	D (kg/m³)	WA (%)	TS (%)
5	7.83 ± 5.72	689.92 ± 21.20	30.98 ± 2.94^a	7.73 ± 1.12^a
3	8.60 ± 3.08	688.90 ± 20.61	32.03 ± 1.24^a	8.36 ± 1.07^a
1	8.94 ± 4.75	686.39 ± 22.37	32.42 ± 1.78^a	8.65 ± 1.16^a
0	9.89 ± 1.98	685.12 ± 29.81	38.83 ± 2.89^b	10.95 ± 0.90^b
Average	8.77 ± 3.88^ns	687.58 ± 23.50^ns	33.57 ± 2.21	8.92 ± 1.06

The letter ns indicates insignificant differences, and different letters (a and b) indicate significant differences between the percentage of moisture content, density, water absorption, and thickness swelling as obtained from ANOVA, p < 0.05, followed by Duncan’s new multiple range test.

SiO₂: silicone dioxide, MC: moisture content, D: density, WA: water absorption, TS: thickness swelling, ANOVA: analysis of variance.

Download Excel Table

Table 2. Internal bonding, modulus of rupture and modulus of elasticity of particleboard under different concentrations of SiO₂

Concentration (%)	IB (MPa)	MOR (MPa)	MOE (MPa)
5	0.42 ± 0.02	15.21 ± 0.67	2,335.96 ± 24.53
3	0.42 ± 0.01	15.41 ± 0.44	2,340.74 ± 22.95
1	0.43 ± 0.03	15.57 ± 0.39	2,349.39 ± 17.65
0	0.43 ± 0.02	15.86 ± 0.77	2,374.64 ± 12.65
Average	0.42 ± 0.02^ns	15.51 ± 0.57^ns	2,350.18 ± 19.42^ns

The letter ns indicates an insignificant difference between the percentage of internal bonding, modulus of rupture, and modulus of elasticity, as obtained from ANOVA, p < 0.05, followed by Duncan’s multiple range test.

SiO₂: silicone dioxide, IB: internal bonding, MOR: modulus of rupture, MOE: modulus of elasticity, ANOVA: analysis of variance.

Download Excel Table

Table 3. Statistical analysis of moisture content, density, water absorption, thickness swelling, internal bonding, modulus of rupture, and modulus of elasticity

List	Group	Sum of squares	df	Mean square	F-value	p-value
MC	Between group	6.543	3	2.181	0.127	0.941
	Within group	137.181	8	17.148
	Total	143.724	11
D	Between group	43.981	3	14.660	0.026	0.994
	Within group	4,527.558	8	565.945
	Total	4,571.539	11
WA	Between group	114.293	3	38.098	7.019	0.012
	Within group	43.425	8	5.428
	Total	157.718	11
TS	Between group	17.723	3	5.908	5.191	0.028
	Within group	9.104	8	1.138
	Total	26.827	11
IB	Between group	0.000	3	0.000	0.243	0.864
	Within group	0.003	8	0.000
	Total	0.003	11
MOR	Between group	0.690	3	0.230	0.664	0.597
	Within group	2.774	8	0.347
	Total	3.464	11
MOE	Between group	2,670.912	3	890.304	2.229	0.162
	Within group	3,195.653	8	399.457
	Total	5,866.566	11

MC: moisture content, D: density, WA: water absorption, TS: thickness swelling, IB: internal bonding, MOR: modulus of rupture, MOE: modulus of elasticity.

Download Excel Table

3.2. Mechanical properties with the addition of silicone dioxide in particleboard from teak sawdust

The IB of the particleboard was more than 0.4 MPa. The highest IB was found with 0% concentration (0.43 ± 0.02 MPa), followed by 1% concentration (0.43 ± 0.03 MPa), 3% concentration (0.42 ± 0.01 MPa), and 5% concentration (0.42 ± 0.02 MPa); these results were all insignificant (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the MOR of particleboard exceeded 14 MPa. The highest MOR was found with 0% concentration (15.86 ± 0.77 MPa), followed by 1% concentration (15.57 ± 0.39 MPa), 3% concentration (15.41 ± 0.44 MPa), and 5% concentration (15.21 ± 0.67 MPa); these values were all insignificant (p < 0.05). The MOE of the particleboard exceeded 1,800 MPa. The highest MOE was found with 0% concentration (2,374.64 ± 12.65 MPa), followed by 1% concentration (2,349.39 ± 17.65 MPa), 3% concentration (2,340.74 ± 22.95 MPa), and 5% concentration (2,335.96 ± 24.53 MPa); these values were all insignificant (p < 0.05). These results align with those of previous studies by Karlinasari et al. (2012) and Semple and Smith (2006), who reported IB values of 0.3–0.5 MPa. The IB strength depends on D (Korai, 2021; Palacios et al., 2018). Drovou et al. (2019) and Moubarik et al. (2010) reported MOR values ranging from to 11–16 MPa and MOE values of approximately 2,225 MPa. The strength value depends on the type and composition in the particleboard (Hrázský and Král, 2003; Kowaluk and Jeżo, 2021; Varanda et al., 2014). Candan and Akbulut (2015) and Karaman et al. (2019) reported that the physical and mechanical performance of wood particleboards decreased when SiO₂ was added because the dispersion of the substance had a slight inhibitory effect on strength (Al-Thobity and Gad, 2021; Karim et al., 2020).

4. CONCLUSIONS

The optimal concentration for SiO₂ addition in particleboard from teak sawdust was at 1% concentration to reduce both WA (32.42% ± 1.78%) and thickness swelling (8.65% ± 1.16%). The product at this concentration passed the standard tests of physical and mechanical properties, which reduced the cost of the SiO₂ content for particleboard processing. These results suggest that SiO₂ can resist moisture content but may slightly reduce the strength.

CONFLICT of INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research was funded by The National Science Research and Innovation Fund from Thailand Science Research and Innovation through The Office of Agricultural Research and Extension, Maejo University, Thailand, for fiscal year 2023.

REFERENCES

Acda, M.N., Cabangon, R.J. 2013. Termite resistance and physico-mechanical properties of particleboard using waste tobacco stalk and wood particles. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 85: 354-358.

Alam, A.U., Howlader, M.M.R., Deen, M.J. 2014. The effects of oxygen plasma and humidity on surface roughness, water contact angle and hardness of silicon, silicon dioxide and glass. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 24(3): 035010.

Al-Thobity, A.M., Gad, M.M. 2021. Effect of silicon dioxide nanoparticles on the flexural strength of heat-polymerized acrylic denture base material: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi Dental Journal 33: 775-783.

Amali, N.W.A., Yunus, N.Y.M., Rahman, W.M.N.W.A. 2021. Mechanical properties of commercial particleboard from rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) and recycle mix-tropical wood with different board density. Science Proceedings Series 3(1): 41-44.

Asanok, L., Taweesuk, R., Kamyo, T. 2024. Teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f) and edaphic factors affecting the regeneration of woody species and their functional traits in economic forest plantation, northern Thailand. International Journal of Forestry Research 2024(201): 2385142.

Banciu, C.A., Chiţanu, E., Mălăeru, T., Marinescu, V., Codescu, M.M., Georgescu, G., Borbath, I. 2023. Comparative study of the hydrophobic properties of silicon dioxide particles functionalized with different agents. Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials 25(1-2): 89-95.

Blanchet, P., Breton, C. 2020. Wood productions and renewable materials: The future is now. Forests 11(6): 657.

Boostani, H., Modirrousta, S. 2016. Review of nanocoatings for building application. Procedia Engineering 145: 1541-1548.

Borz, S.A., Oghnoum, M., Marcu, M.V., Lorincz, A., Proto, A.R. 2021. Performance of small-scale sawmilling operations: A case study on time consumption, productivity and main ergonomics for a manually driven bandsaw. Forests 12(6): 810.

10.

Bouaphavong, D., Jarusombuti, S., Veenin, T., Phonetip, K. 2023. Appropriate sawing techniques for improving teak log (Tectona grandis) from plantation in Lao PDR. Souphanouvong University Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 9(2): 93-99.

11.

Buareal, K., Buajan, S., Preechamart, S., Muangsong, C., Pumijumnong, N. 2020. A 177 years extended of teak chronology revealing to the climate variability in Phrae province, northern of Thailand. Applied Environmental Research 42(1): 85-100.

12.

Candan, Z., Akbulut, T. 2015. Physical and mechanical properties of nanoreinforced particleboard composites. Maderas. Ciencia Y Tecnología 17(2): 319-334.

13.

Chauhan, S.S., Maurya, N.K., Dwivedi, S.P. 2021. Effect of particle size and weight percent of different wood dust on the tensile strength of glass fiber epoxy/saw dust composite using RSM. Materials Today: Proceedings 47(Part 13): 3936-3942.

14.

Chaydarreh, K.C., Lin, X., Guan, L., Hu, C. 2022. Interaction between particle size and mixing ratio on porosity and properties of tea oil Camellia (Camellia oleifera Abel.) shells-based particleboard. Journal of Wood Science 68(1): 43.

15.

ChooChuay, C., Pongpiachan, S., Tipmanee, D., Deelaman, W., Iadtem, N., Suttinun, O., Wang, Q., Xing, L., Li, G., Han, Y., Hashmi, M.Z., Palakun, J., Poshyachinda, S., Aukkaravittayapun, S., Surapipith, V., Cao, J. 2020. Effects of agricultural waste burning on PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbonaceous compositions, and water-soluble ionic species in the ambient air of Chiang-mai, Thailand. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds 42(3): 749-770.

16.

Chotikhun, A., Hiziroglu, S., Kard, B., Konemann, C., Buser, M., Frazier, S. 2018. Measurement of termite resistance of particleboard panels made from Eastern redcedar using nano particle added modified starch as binder. Measurement 120: 169-174.

17.

Damayanti, R., Ozarska, B., Pandit, I.K.N., Febrianto, F., Pari, G. 2018. Wood properties of 5-year-old fast grown teak. Wood Research Journal 9(2): 29-34.

18.

de Souza, M.V., da Silva, S.A.M., Cazella, P.H.S., Rodrigues, F.R., Bonfim, K.S., Sanches, A.O., De Araujo, V.A., dos Santos, H.F., Pinto, E.M., Christoforo, A.L., Aouada, M.R., Aouada, F.A., Lahr, F.A.R. 2022. Particleboards manufactured from Tectona grandis wood waste with homogeneous and three-layer heterogeneous compositions for commercial purposes. BioResources 17(3): 5011-5020.

19.

Drovou, S., Kassegne, K.A., Kadja, K., Koffi, D., Koutsawa, Y., Sanda, K. 2019. Evaluation of mechanical, physical and thermal properties of particleboard from teak (Tectona grandis) sawdust with the tannic powder of African locust bean pod (Parkia biglobossa). International Journal of Current Research 11(06): 4821-4829.

20.

Dukarska, D., Derkowski, A. 2014. Rape straw-wood particleboards resinated with UF resin and supplemented with nano-SiO₂. Forestry and Wood Technology 85: 49-52.

21.

Dukarska, D., Rogoziński, T., Antov, P., Kristak, L., Kmieciak, J. 2022. Characterisation of wood particles used in the particleboard production as a function of their moisture content. Materials 15(1): 48.

22.

Egwutvongsa, S. 2023. Eco-economy: Utilization of sapwood scraps for sustainable economic value in communities. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 12(1): 102-116.

23.

Flaherty, M.S., Filipchuk, V.R. 1993. Forest management in northern Thailand: A rural Thai perspective. Geoforum 24(3): 263-275.

24.

Fu, Y., Luo, F., Ma, L., Dai, H., Wang, H., Chen, H., Zhu, H., Yu, Y., Hou, Y., Zhang, Y. 2023. The moisture adsorption, caking, and flowability of silkworm pupae peptide powders: The impacts of anticaking agents. Food Chemistry 419: 135989.

25.

Garzón-Barrero, N.M., Shirakawa, M.A., Brazolin, S., Pereira, R.G.F.N.B., de Lara, I.A.R., Savastano, H. Jr. 2016. Evaluation of mold growth on sugarcane bagasse particleboards in natural exposure and in accelerated test. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 115: 266-276.

26.

Goldhahn, C., Cabane, E., Chanana, M. 2021. Sustainability in wood materials science: An opinion about current material development techniques and the end of lifetime perspectives. Philosophical Transactions A 379(2206): 20200339.

27.

Griyanitasari, G., Pahlawan, I.F. 2020. Characteristics of organic fertilizer derived from fleshing waste with teak (Tectona grandis) wood scrap. Majalah Kulit, Karet, dan Plastik 36(2): 81-88.

28.

Hartono, R., Dalimunthe, A.M., Iswanto, A.H., Herawati, E., Sutiawan, J., Azevedo, A.R.G. 2022. Mechanical and physical properties of particleboard made from the Sumatran elephant (Elephas maximus sumatranus) dung and wood shaving. Polymers 14(11): 2237.

29.

Hrázský, J., Král, P. 2003. The influence of particle composition in a three-layer particleboard on its physical and mechanical properties. Journal of Forest Science 49(2): 83-93.

30.

Ikubanni, P.P., Adeleke, A.A., Adediran, A.A., Agboola, O.O. 2018. Physico-mechanical properties of particleboards produced from locally sourced materials. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa 39: 112-118.

31.

Istek, A., Aydin, U., Ozlusoylu, I. 2019. The effect of mat layers moisture content on some properties of particleboard. Drvna Industrija 70(3): 221-228.

32.

Iswanto, A.H., Febrianto, F., Hadi, Y.S., Ruhendi, S., Hermawan, D. 2013. The effect of pressing temperature and time on the quality of particle board made from Jatropha fruit hulls treated in acidic condition. Makara Journal of Technology 17(3): 145-151.

33.

Japanese Industrial Standard [JIS]. 2003. Particleboards. JIS A 5908. Japanese Standard Association, Tokyo, Japan.

34.

Kaakkurivaara, N., Kaakkurivaara, T., Ketkaew, C., Sakulya, T., Borz, S.A. 2022. Modelling productivity in extraction operations by simulations based on GNSS documented data: An example from skidding teak wood in Thailand. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov 15(2): 13-32.

35.

Kanthawong, P., Somsri, C., Sangkadis, K., Chuagulajati, T., Sawetpawit, K., Koonklean, P. 2023. Creating value-added teak products for the elderly according to the creative economy concept. Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics 3(2): 433-446.

36.

Karaman, A., Yıldırım, M.N., Yaşar, Ş.Ş. 2019. Determination of modulus of elasticity and bending strength of wood material impregnated with nanoparticle silicon dioxide (SiO₂). Turkish Journal of Forestry 20(1): 50-56.

37.

Karim, A.N., Hashim, R., Sulaiman, O. 2017. Dimensional stability properties of particleboard bonded with starch based bio-adhesives. In: Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, Proceeding of National Conference on Wood Based Technology Engineering and Innovation 2017 (NCWEI’17), pp. 16-31.

38.

Karim, N.A., Lamaming, J., Yusof, M., Hashim, R., Sulaiman, O., Hiziroglu, S., Nadhari, W.N.A.W., Salleh, K.M., Taiwo, O.F. 2020. Properties of native and blended oil palm starch with nano-silicon dioxide as binder for particleboard. Journal of Building Engineering 29: 101151.

39.

Karlinasari, L., Hermawan, D., Maddu, A., Martiandi, B., Hadi, Y.S. 2012. Development of particleboard from tropical fast-growing species for acoustic panel. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 24(1): 64-69.

40.

Klinpikul, N., Srichandr, P. 2009. Status of eco-design in Thai furniture industry. Key Engineering Materials 419-420: 769-772.

41.

Korai, H. 2021. Difficulty of internal bond prediction of particleboard using the density profile. Journal of Wood Science 67: 64.

42.

Korai, H., Uemura, K., Esashi, T., Suzuki, M. 1999. Dimensional stability and strength properties of particleboard produced by a closed-press system. Journal of Wood Science 45: 402-410.

43.

Kowaluk, G., Jeżo, A. 2021. Compression strength-focused properties of wood composites induced by density. Forestry and Wood Technology 116: 96-110.

44.

Kunickaya, O., Pomiguev, A., Kruchinin, I., Storodubtseva, T., Voronova, A., Levushkin, D., Borisov, V., Ivanov, V. 2022. Analysis of modern wood processing techniques in timber terminals. Central European Forestry Journal 68(1): 51-59.

45.

Laemlaksakul, V., Sangsai, N. 2013. A study of ecological products by life cycle assessment in the Thai furniture industry. Applied Mechanics and Materials 431(2013): 344-349.

46.

Li, B., Olmstead, R.G. 2017. Two new subfamilies in Lamiaceae. Phytotaxa 313(2): 222-226.

47.

Liu, C., Yang, D., Liu, Y., Piao, H., Zhang, T., Li, X., Zhao, E., Zhang, D., Zheng, Y., Tang, X. 2022. The effect of ambient PM_2.5 exposure on survival of lung cancer patients after lobectomy. Environmental Health 22(23): 1-16.

48.

Liu, Q., Xu, C., Ji, G., Liu, H., Shao, W., Zhang, C., Gu, A., Zhao, P. 2017. Effect of exposure to ambient PM2.5 pollution on the risk of respiratory tract diseases: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. The Journal of Biomedical Research 31(2): 130-142.

49.

Masturi, Jannah, W.N., Maulana, R.M., Darsono, T., Sunarno, Rustad, S. 2020. Mechanical and physical properties of teak leaves waste/polyurethane composites for particleboard application. Advanced Composites Letters 29(19): 2633366X20962507.

50.

Meng, L., Liu, Q., Wang, J., Fan, Z., Wei, X. 2020. Hydrophobic mesoporous silicon dioxide for improving foam stability. RSC Advances 10(32): 18565-18571.

51.

Miranda, I., Sousa, V., Pereira, H. 2011. Wood properties of teak (Tectona grandis) from a mature unmanaged stand in East Timor. Journal of Wood Science 57(3): 171-178.

52.

Moubarik, A., Allal, A., Pizzi, A., Charrier, F., Charrier, B. 2010. Preparation and mechanical characterization of particleboard made from maritime pine and glued with bio-adhesives based on cornstarch and tannins. Maderas. Ciencia Y Tecnología 12(3): 189-197.

53.

Nakhjirgan, P., Mahmoodi, M., Kashani, H., Firooz, A., Nabizadeh, R., Kermani, M., Yunesian, M. 2019. Air pollution and exacerbation of skin itching and sleep disturbance in Iranian atopic dermatitis patients. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering 17(2): 811-816.

54.

Namuene, K.S., Egbe, A.E. 2022. Impact of timber logging on neighbouring stands in a forest of the South Western Cameroon. Open Journal of Forestry 12(2): 248-262.

55.

Nazerian, M., Nanaii, H.A., Gargarii, R.M. 2018. Silica (SiO₂) content on mechanical properties of cement-bonded particleboard manufactured from lignocellulosic materials. Drvna Industrija 69(4): 317-328.

56.

Nortuy, N., Suthapakti, K., Utama-ang, N. 2018. Effects of maltodextrin and silicon dioxide added as anticaking agents on the properties of instant date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) powder using spray drying. Journal of Advanced Agricultural Technologies 5(2): 86-92.

57.

Nourbakhsh, A. 2010. Mechanical and thickness swelling of particleboard composites made from three-year-old poplar clones. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 29(4): 481-489.

58.

Palacios, P., Fernández, F.G., García-Iruela, A., González-Rodrigo, B., Esteban, L.G. 2018. Study of the influence of the physical properties of particleboard type P2 on the internal bond of panels using artificial neural networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 155: 142-149.

59.

Peter, A.E., Nagendra, S.M.S. 2021. Dynamics of PM_2.5 pollution in the vicinity of the old municipal solid waste dumpsite. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 193(5): 281.

60.

Putra, R., Muhammad, M., Hafli, T., Islami, N., Nugraha, M.P., Irsyad, M.K. 2022. Analysis of the mechanical properties of teak sawdust-reinforced composite boards affected by the alkalization process. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology 2(4): 11-18.

61.

Rivela, B., Hospido, A., Moreira, M.A., Feijoo, G. 2006. Life cycle inventory of particleboard: A case study in the wood sector. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(2): 106-113.

62.

Rout, S. 2018. Sustaining southeast Asia’s forests: Community, institution and forest governance in Thailand. Millennial Asia 9(2): 140-161.

63.

Salam, M.A., Noguchi, T., Pothitan, R. 2006. Community forest management in Thailand: Current situation and dynamics in the context of sustainable development. New Forests 31(2): 273-291.

64.

Schubert, M., Panzarasa, G., Burgert, I. 2023. Sustainability in wood products: A new perspective for handling natural diversity. Chemical Reviews 123(5): 1889-1924.

65.

Scott, A.J. 2008. Patterns of development in the furniture industry of Thailand: Organization, location and trade. Regional Studies 42(1): 17-30.

66.

Semple, K.E., Smith, G.D. 2006. Prediction of internal bond strength in particleboard from screw withdrawal resistance models. Wood and Fiber Science 38(2): 256-267.

67.

Seta, G.W., Hidayati, F., Widiyatno, W., Na’iem, M. 2023. Wood physical and mechanical properties of clonal teak (Tectona grandis) stands under different thinning and pruning intensity levels planted in Java, Indonesia. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 51(2): 109-132.

68.

Sukuman, T., Ueda, K., Sujaritpong, S., Praekunatham, H., Punnasiri, K., Wimuktayon, T., Prapaspongsa, T. 2023. Health impacts from PM2.5 exposure using environmental epidemiology and health risk assessment: A review. Applied Environmental Research 45(3): 010.

69.

Takaoka, M., Shiota, K., Imai, G., Oshita, K. 2016. Emission of particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) and elements from municipal solid waste incinerators. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 18(1): 72-80.

70.

Thulasidas, P.K., Bhat, K.M. 2012. Mechanical properties and wood structure characteristics of 35-year old home-garden teak from wet and dry localities of Kerala, India in comparison with plantation teak. Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science 9(1): 23-32.

71.

Valle, A.C.M., Ferreira, B.S., Prates, G.A., Goveia, D., de Campos, C.I. 2020. Physical and mechanical properties of particleboard from Eucalyptus grandis produced by urea formaldehyde resin with SiO₂ nanoparticles. Engenharia Agrícola, Jaboticabal 40(3): 289-293.

72.

Varanda, L.D., Souza, A.M., Almeida, D.H., Icimoto, F.H., Ferro, F.S., Christoforo, A.L., Lahr, F.A.R. 2014. Strength and stiffness properties of particleboards. International Journal of Composite Materials 4(2): 150-156.

73.

Viswanathan, R., Gothandapani, L., Kailappan, R. 2000. Water absorption and swelling characteristics of coir pith particle board. Bioresource Technology 71(1): 93-94.

74.

Wanneng, P., Ozarska, B., Phimmavong, S., Yoshimoto, A. 2021. Market preference of wood characteristics and properties of plantation grown teak (Tectona grandis Linn.F) in Laos. Forest Resources & Mathematical Modeling 20(1): 1-12.

75.

Wanneng, P.X., Ozarska, B., Daian, M.S. 2014. Physical properties of Tectona grandis grown in Laos. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 26(3): 389-396.

76.

Yang, S., Galih, N.M., Kim, J., Lee, H., Kang, S. 2023. Physical and mechanical properties of particleboard mixed with waste ACQ-treated wood. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 26(1): 410-420.

77.

Zakaria, R., Bawon, P., Lee, S.H., Salim, S., Lum, W.C., Al-Edrus, S.S.O., Ibrahim, Z. 2021. Properties of particleboard from oil palm biomasses bonded with citric acid and tapioca starch. Polymers 13(20): 3494.

78.

Zhang, T., Mao, W., Gao, J., Song, X., Li, L., Sun, X., Ding, X., Li, J., Zhai, Y., Ma, W., Zhao, J. 2022. The effects of PM2.5 on lung cancer-related mortality in different regions and races: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 15: 1523-1532.